Comedian David Walliams is named as an unnamed celebrity in sexual misconduct allegations after a failed attempt to conceal his identity.

David Walliams has been identified as the “suicidal” celebrity accused of sexual misconduct trying to stop publications from revealing his name.

The actor has already threatened to commit suicide if his identity was revealed by the media, as The Guardian did on Tuesday morning.

According to the media, the author of successful children’s books is accused by several women of using his status to prepare them for sexual relations.

The identity of the ‘suicidal’ celebrity accused of sexual misconduct has been revealed as David Walliams (pictured above in May 2024.) Getty Images
He was seeking an injunction against Independent Television News (ITN) as well as Guardian News and Media. (Pictured above: Walliams in December 2024.) Dave Bennett/Getty Images

Two of the accusers, now in their thirties, claim to have met the actor for the first time when they were 15.

The Guardian noted that the allegations against the 55-year-old are believed to have spanned decades, from his BBC sketch show days to his time on “Britain’s Got Talent,” but the outlet did not provide further details.

HarperCollins, notably, made headlines last year for cutting ties with Walliams – and dropping its entire catalog – after an internal investigation into “inappropriate behavior” towards young female employees.

The former ‘Britain’s Got Talent’ judge (pictured above in December 2024) denied being a “sexual predator” in a statement. WireImage
However, he admitted to having “behaved thoughtlessly” in his “casual sexual relations”. (Pictured above: Walliams in December 2025.) Instagram/dwalliams

According to The Guardian, Walliams had a sexual relationship with a junior staff member at the publishing house.

Walliams denied any wrongdoing in a statement released Tuesday, writing: “Looking back, I realize that at times I behaved rashly towards other people with whom I had casual sexual relationships.

“And while an imbalance of power is inevitable when a party is famous, abusing that power is a whole different thing and something I have never done,” he continued. “I am not a sexual predator. I did not break the law, but I am devastated that some of the women I met 10 or 20 years ago are now expressing their hurt or anger towards me.”

Walliams (pictured above in ‘Little Britain’ with Matt Lucas) is best known for his sketch comedy shows on the BBC and as a guest judge on ‘Britain’s Got Talent’. ©BBC/Courtesy of Everett Collection / Everett Collection

The outlet and ITV News, among others, have been jointly investigating Walliams for months, speaking to young models and fans claiming TK sent them messages on social media when they were between 17 and 22, many of whom described their interactions as “distressing” and still affecting them years later.

News organizations also spoke to several people who allegedly witnessed or witnessed Walliams’ harassment of young women in the workplace.

Walliams, notably, sought an injunction against Independent Television News (ITN) as well as Guardian News and Media, which wanted to publish the allegations with his name, but he lost his bid on November 3 when the judge ruled that he could be named.

He is also a bestselling children’s book author – although HarperCollins cut ties with him last year over “inappropriate behavior” towards female staff. (Pictured above: Walliams in December 2025.) Jed Cullen/Dave Benett/Getty Images

“The application made by the plaintiff is dismissed and the application for an injunction is refused,” Mr Justice Nicklin told the High Court in London.

However, initially, Nicklin issued a temporary injunction that protected his anonymity while he and his legal team decided whether to appeal.

His legal team told the court their client was not well enough to make a decision on whether to appeal.

On November 3, Mr Justice Nicklin (see above) ruled that Independent Television News (ITN) and Guardian News could publish his name. /Avalon
In court, the man and his legal team argued that if his name and allegations were published, he would attempt suicide, as he has done twice before. Anadolu via Getty Images

During the proceedings, his lawyer, Sara Mansoori KC, argued that if her client’s name were published, he would attempt suicide, as he had attempted to do twice before.

She told the court: “The only reason they would not be fatal is because the claimant would be locked up and prevented from fulfilling his desire to end his life. »

“The plaintiff attempted suicide twice as a result of these events, was hospitalized for months, was subject to involuntary detention and was examined by several – now more than 10 – doctors.”

However, the posts claimed that they were not responsible for his mental health and that he should seek treatment at a hospital. Getty Images
The media also said it had conducted extensive investigations into allegations of “abuse of power and status” to contact young women and attempt to engage in “inappropriate and exploitative sexual activities.” Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Mansoori also said that although the plaintiff denies the allegations, he “does not intend to return to public life.”

As for ITN and GNM, their lawyer argued that “the obligation lies with the hospital to ensure its safety”, and not with the media.

He also argued that his alleged victims who came forward “were traumatized by the Plaintiff’s alleged conduct and suffered mental health crises and mental illnesses as a result.”

Gn entert

Scroll to Top