Radzicka, A. & Wolfenden, R. Rates of uncatalyzed peptide bond hydrolysis in neutral solution and transition state affinities of proteases. Jam. Chemical. Soc. 1186105-6109 (1996).
Dyer, RP & Weiss, GA Making a difference through protease engineering. Cellular chemistry. Biol. 29177-190 (2022).
Otto, H.-H. & Schirmeister, T. Cysteine proteases and their inhibitors. Chemical. Round. 97133-172 (1997).
Carter, P. & Wells, JA Dissecting the catalytic triad of a serine protease. Nature 332564-568 (1988.
Ménard, R. et al. The modification of the electrostatic environment is tolerated in the oxyanion hole of the papain cysteine protease. Biochemistry 34464-471 (1995).
Verma, S., Dixit, R. & Pandey, KC Cysteine proteases: modes of activation and future prospects as pharmacological targets. In front. Pharmacol. 7107 (2016).
Lauko, A. et al. Computational design of serine hydrolases. Science 388eadu2454 (2025).
Kim, D. et al. Computational design of metallohydrolases. Nature 649246-253 (2026).
Ahern, W. et al. Scaffolding of enzymatic active sites at the atomic level using RFdiffusion2. Nat. Methods 2396-105 (2026).
Bauer, MS et al. De novo design of phospho-tyrosine peptide binders. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.29.678898 (2025).
Mossessova, E. & Lima, CD Ulp1-SUMO crystal structure and genetic analysis reveal conserved interactions and an essential regulatory element for cell growth in yeast. Mol. Cell 5865-876 (2000).
Dauparas, J. et al. Robust deep learning-based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN. Science 37849-56 (2022).
Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630493-500 (2024).
Bindels, DS et al. mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. Nat. Methods 1453-56 (2017).
Matayoshi, ED, Wang, GT, Krafft, GA and Erickson, J. Novel fluorogenic substrates for the assay of retroviral proteases by resonance energy transfer. Science 247954-958 (1990).
Hofer, F., Kraml, J., Kahler, U., Kamenik, AS & Liedl, KR pKa values of the catalytic site of aspartic, cysteine and serine proteases: MD simulations at constant pH. J.Chem. Inf. Model. 603030-3042 (2020).
Zhai, X. & Meek, TD Catalytic mechanism of cruzain of Trypanosoma cruzi as determined from solvent kinetic isotope effects on steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetics. Biochemistry 573176-3190 (2018).
Daniel, RM & Danson, MJ A new understanding of how temperature affects the catalytic activity of enzymes. Biochemistry Trends. Sci 35584-591 (2010).
Xu, Z. et al. Molecular basis of redox regulation of SUMO proteases: a mechanism for protecting the intermolecular disulfide bond against irreversible sulfhydryl oxidation. FASEB J. 22127-137 (2008).
van Kempen, M. et al. Fast and accurate protein structure research with Foldseek. Nat. Biotechnology. 42243-246 (2024).
Zhang, Y. & Skolnick, J. Scoring function for automated protein structure model quality assessment. Proteins 57702-710 (2004).
Anishchenko, I. et al. Modeling protein-small molecule conformational ensembles with PLACER. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122e2427161122 (2025).
LaLonde, JM et al. Using Papain as a Model for Structure-Based Design of Cathepsin K Inhibitors: Crystal structures of two papain-inhibitor complexes demonstrate binding to S′ subsites. J.Med. Chemical. 414567-4576 (1998).
Tsuge, H. et al. Mechanism of inhibition of specific cathepsin L inhibitors based on the crystal structure of the papain-CLIK148 complex. Biochemistry. Biophysics. Res. Common. 266411-416 (1999).
Moldoveanu, T., Campbell, RL, Cuerrier, D. and Davies, PL Crystal structures of calpain-E64 and -leupeptin inhibitor complexes reveal mobile loops controlling the active site. J. Mol. Biol. 3431313-1326 (2004).
Falke, S. et al. Structural elucidation and antiviral activity of covalent cathepsin L inhibitors. J.Med. Chemical. 677048-7067 (2024).
Yamamoto, A. et al. Structural basis for the development of the specific noncovalent type inhibitor of cathepsin B: crystal structure of the cathepsin B-E64c complex. Biochemistry. Biophysics. Acta 1597244-251 (2002).
Pauly, TA et al. Specificity determinants of human cathepsins revealed by the crystal structures of the complexes. Biochemistry 423203-3213 (2003).
Huang, L., Brinen, L.S. and Ellman, J.A. Crystal structures of reversible ketone inhibitors of Cruzan cysteine protease. Bioorg. Med. Chemical. 1121-29 (2003).
Kapust, RB et al. Tobacco etch virus protease: mechanism of autolysis and rational design of stable mutants with wild-type catalytic competence. Protein engineering. 14993-1000 (2001).
Kenneson, JR et al. Exploring possible drug-resistant variants of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) with a non-covalent preclinical candidate, Mpro61. ACS Bio Med Chem Au 5215-226 (2025).
Mei, M. et al. A combinatorial strategy for engineering HRV 3C protease to achieve free N-terminal cleavage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 265131066 (2024).
Pearlman, DA et al. AMBER, a set of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics, and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules. Calculate. Phys. Common. 911–41 (1995).
Shaffer, J.M. & Greenwald, I. SALSA, a genetically encoded biosensor for spatiotemporal quantification of Notch signal transduction in vivo. Dev. Cell 57930-944.e6 (2022).
Gao, XJ, Chong, LS, Kim, MS & Elowitz, MB Programmable protein circuits in living cells. Science 3611252-1258 (2018).
Roybal, KT et al. Engineering T cells with personalized therapeutic response programs using synthetic Notch receptors. Cell 167419-432 (2016).
Barnea, G. et al. The genetic design of signaling cascades to record receptor activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 10564-69 (2008).
Coukos, R. et al. A transcriptional protein localization reporter identifies regulators of mitochondrial and ER membrane protein trafficking in high-throughput CRISPRi screens. eLife 10e69142 (2021).
Novinec, M. & Lenarčič, B. Papain-type peptidases: structure, function and evolution. Biomol. Concepts 4287-308 (2013).
Hekkelman, ML, Salmoral, D. Á, Perrakis, A. & Joosten, RP DSSP 4: FAIR annotation of protein secondary structure. Protein Sci. 34e70208 (2025).
Bennett, NR et al. Improving de novo design of protein binders using deep learning. Nat. Common. 142625 (2023).
Kuo, C.-J., Chi, Y.-H., Hsu, JT-A. & Liang, P.-H. Characterization of the primary SARS protease and inhibitor assay using a fluorogenic substrate. Biochemistry. Biophysics. Res. Common. 318862-867 (2004).
Kabsch, W. Integration, scaling, space group assignment and post-refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D 66133-144 (2010).
Winn, MD et al. Presentation of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D 67235-242 (2011).
McCoy, AJ et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J.Appl. Crystallogr. 40658-674 (2007).
Adams, PD et al. PHENIX: a complete Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. In International crystallography tables 539-547 (International Union of Crystallography, 2012).
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: Modeling tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 602126-2132 (2004).
Williams, CJ et al. MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27293-315 (2018).
Gn tech
