Trump’s Fed pressure campaign hits new Democratic wall in Senate

Democrats took control of the Senate on Tuesday, a seismic shift that effectively blocks President Trump’s campaign to reshape the Federal Reserve and neutralizes what many analysts see as a threat to the central bank’s independence.

It also increases the challenge for Trump if he tries to replace sitting officials.

“Democratic control of the Senate regains the party’s ability to approve or reject the president’s nominations for judges and heads of other executive agencies,” Jonathan Pingle, an economist at UBS, wrote in a note. “This includes the need for Democrats to approve any new members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors in the event that one of the current governors steps down.”

This political firewall has a direct impact on the administration’s ongoing efforts to remove Fed Governor Lisa Cook. Trump fired Cook in August 2025, claiming she committed mortgage fraud by making false statements on loan documents years before her appointment to the central bank. Cook, a Biden appointee, has denied any wrongdoing and filed a lawsuit. The lawsuit went through several court proceedings before reaching the Supreme Court earlier this year.

Last month, Trump created a committee to determine whether his statements constituted legal “cause” to withdraw from the central bank, signaling that his efforts to oust him continue.

Learn more: How much control does the president have over the Fed and interest rates?

However, Tuesday’s elections significantly changed the stakes of this investigation. Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JPMorgan, noted that the Senate change changes the math for the White House.

“Even a successful impeachment would not open a seat for a friend of the administration,” Feroli wrote in a client note.

Jaret Seiberg, an analyst at TD Cowen, agrees that the inability to confirm a replacement could make Trump less likely to fire Cook.

However, not everyone is convinced the administration will back down. Loretta Mester, former head of the Cleveland Fed, told Yahoo Finance: “It may make it less likely to succeed, but I’m not convinced it will stop the president from trying.” »

FILE - Federal Reserve Board of Governors member Lisa Cook speaks during an event at the Brookings Institution, Nov. 3, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein, file)
Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook speaks during an event at the Brookings Institution on November 3, 2025 in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein, file) · AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

More broadly, the coming to power of Democrats in Congress changes the atmosphere in which Fed officials work to define a monetary policy devoid of political influence.

Trump urged policymakers to lower interest rates. The central bank has remained stable, occasionally raising rates despite pressure from the White House. The new power dynamic gives them more cover.

“The election result means the president has less influence — over Congress, over the country and over the Fed,” Daleep Singh, chief global economist at PGIM and a former senior Biden administration official, said in an interview on Bloomberg Television. “Voters are angry about the rising cost of living. You put those two thoughts together, and the Fed is in a unique position to do something about it.”

Learn more: How Employment, Inflation, and the Fed Are All Related

Beyond the Cook dispute, the new Senate majority will dictate the Fed’s long-term leadership.

While the natural turnover of Board of Governors members for 14-year terms is historically slow, key institutional changes are looming. There is only one governor whose term ends in the next two years: Jay Powell’s in January 2028. Following the election, the administration will now have to replace Powell with someone who defers to Senate Democrats, or else leave the seat vacant. Vice President Philip Jefferson’s term as vice president ends in September, but he could remain governor.

In the short term, the political change gives current Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh, a Trump appointee, room to maneuver.

RSM economist Joseph Brusuelas considered Warsh one of the big winners of the election.

“There is a sense that the administration will have other priorities over the next two years,” Brusuelas wrote on

But Feroli warned that if Warsh wants to remain Fed chairman beyond one term, which ends in May 2030, he should start courting the new legislative majority.

“While there are other elections between now and then, last night increased the chances that his term will end with Democratic control of the Senate,” Feroli said. “Unless he wants to serve as a single-term president, Warsh will have to spend less time looking out the window and more time walking the halls of Congress.”

Follow Jennifer Schonberger on X @Jenniferismes and on Instagram.



Gn bussni

Scroll to Top